Document text
Circular No.135/05/2020 - GST
Page 1 of 6
CBEC-20/01/06/2019-GST
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs
GST Policy Wing
****
New Delhi, Dated the 31st March, 2020
To,
The
Principal
Chief
Commissioners/Chief
Commissioners/Principal
Commissioners/
Commissioners of Central Tax (All)
The Principal Director Generals/ Director Generals (All)
Madam/Sir,
Subject: Clarification on refund related issues – Reg.
Various representations have been received seeking clarification on some of the issues
relating to GST refunds. In order to clarify these issues and to ensure uniformity in the
implementation of the provisions of law in this regard across the field formations, the Board, in
exercise of its powers conferred by section 168 (1) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act,
2017 (hereinafter referred to as “CGST Act”), hereby clarifies the issues detailed hereunder:
2. Bunching of refund claims across Financial Years
2.1
It may be recalled that the restriction on clubbing of tax periods across different financial
years was put in vide para 11.2 of the Circular No. 37/11/2018-GST dated 15.03.2018. The said
circular was rescinded being subsumed in the Master Circular on Refunds No. 125/44/2019-GST
dated 18.11.2019 and the said restriction on the clubbing of tax periods across financial years for
claiming refund thus has been continued vide Paragraph 8 of the Circular No. 125/44/2019-GST
dated 18.11.2019, which is reproduced as under:
“8. The applicant, at his option, may file a refund claim for a tax period or by clubbing
successive tax periods. The period for which refund claim has been filed, however,
cannot spread across different financial years. Registered persons having aggregate
turnover of up to Rs. 1.5 crore in the preceding financial year or the current financial year
opting to file FORM GSTR-1 on quarterly basis, can only apply for refund on a quarterly
basis or clubbing successive quarters as aforesaid. However, refund claims under
categories listed at (a), (c) and (e) in para 3 above must be filed by the applicant
chronologically. This means that an applicant, after submitting a refund application under
any of these categories for a certain period, shall not be subsequently allowed to file a
refund claim under the same category for any previous period. This principle / limitation,
however, shall not apply in cases where a fresh application is being filed pursuant to a
deficiency memo having been issued earlier.”
Circular No.135/05/2020 - GST
Page 2 of 6
2.2
Hon’ble Delhi High Court in Order dated 21.01.2020, in the case of M/s Pitambra Books
Pvt Ltd., vide para 13 of the said order has stayed the rigour of paragraph 8 of Circular No.
125/44/2019-GST dated 18.11.2019 and has also directed the Government to either open the online
portal so as to enable the petitioner to file the tax refund electronically, or to accept the same
manually within 4 weeks from the Order. Hon’ble Delhi High Court vide para 12 of the aforesaid
Order has observed that the Circulars can supplant but not supplement the law. Circulars
might mitigate rigours of law by granting administrative relief beyond relevant provisions
of the statute, however, Central Government is not empowered to withdraw benefits or
impose stricter conditions than postulated by the law.
2.3
Further, same issue has been raised in various other representations also, especially those
received from the merchant exporters wherein merchant exporters have received the supplies of
goods in the last quarter of a Financial Year and have made exports in the next Financial Year i.e.
from April onwards. The restriction imposed vide para 8 of the master refund circular prohibits
the refund of ITC accrued in such cases as well.
2.4
On perusal of the provisions under sub-section (3) of section 16 of the Integrated Goods
and Services Tax Act, 2017 and sub-section (3) of section 54 of the CGST Act, there appears no
bar in claiming refund by clubbing different months across successive Financial Years.
2.5
The issue has been examined and it has been decided to remove the restriction on clubbing
of tax periods across Financial Years. Accordingly, circular No. 125/44/2019-GST dated
18.11.2019 stands modified to that extent i.e. the restriction on bunching of refund claims across
financial years shall not apply.
3. Refund of accumulated input tax credit (ITC) on account of reduction in GST Rate
3.1
It has been brought to the notice of the Board that some of the applicants are seeking refund
of unutilized ITC on account of inverted duty structure where the inversion is due to change in the
GST rate on the same goods. This can be explained through an illustration. An applicant trading
in goods has purchased, say goods “X” attracting 18% GST. However, subsequently, the rate of
GST on “X” has been reduced to, say 12%. It is being claimed that accumulation of ITC in such a
case is also covered as accumulation on account of inverted duty structure and such applicants
have sought refund of accumulated ITC under clause (ii) of sub-section (3) of section 54 of the
CGST Act.
3.2
It may be noted that refund of accumulated ITC in terms clause (ii) of sub-section (3) of
section 54 of the CGST Act is available where the credit has accumulated on account of rate of tax
on inputs being higher than the rate of tax on output supplies. It is noteworthy that, the input and
output being the same in such cases, though attracting different tax rates at different points in time,
do not get covered under the provisions of clause (ii) of sub-section (3) of section 54 of the CGST
Act. It is hereby clarified that refund of accumulated ITC under clause (ii) of sub-section (3) of
section 54 of the CGST Act would not be applicable in cases where the input and the output
supplies are the same.
Circular No.135/05/2020 - GST
Page 3 of 6
4. Change in manner of refund of tax paid on supplies other than zero rated supplies
4.1
Circular No. 125/44/2019-GST dated 18.11.2019, in para 3, categorizes the refund
applications to be filed in FORM GST RFD-01 as under:
a. Refund of unutilized input tax credit (ITC) on account of exports without payment of
tax;
b. Refund of tax paid on export of services with payment of tax;
c. Refund of unutilized ITC on account of supplies made to SEZ Unit/SEZ Developer
without payment of tax;
d. Refund of tax paid on supplies made to SEZ Unit/SEZ Developer with payment of tax;
e. Refund of unutilized ITC on account of accumulation due to inverted tax structure;
f. Refund to supplier of tax paid on deemed export supplies;
g. Refund to recipient of tax paid on deemed export supplies;
h. Refund of excess balance in the electronic cash ledger;
i. Refund of excess payment of tax;
j. Refund of tax paid on intra-State supply which is subsequently held to be inter-
State supply and vice versa;
k. Refund on account of assessment/provisional assessment/appeal/any other order;
l. Refund on account of “any other” ground or reason.
4.2
For the refund of tax paid falling in categories specified at S. No. (i) to (l) above i.e. refund
claims on supplies other than zero rated supplies, no separate debit of ITC from electronic credit
ledger is required to be made by the applicant at the time of filing refund claim, being claim of tax
already paid. However, the total tax would have been normally paid by the applicant by debiting
tax amount from both electronic credit ledger and electronic cash ledger. At present, in these cases,
the amount of admissible refund, is paid in cash even when such payment of tax or any part thereof,
has been made through ITC.
4.3.1 As this could lead to allowing unintended encashment of credit balances, this issue has
been engaging attention of the Government. Accordingly, vide notification No.16/2020-Central
Tax dated 23.03.2020, sub-rule (4A) has been inserted in rule 86 of the CGST Rules, 2017 which
reads as under:
“(4A) Where a registered person has claimed refund of any amount paid as tax wrongly
paid or paid in excess for which debit has been made from the electronic credit ledger, the
said amount, if found admissible, shall be re-credited to the electronic credit ledger by the
proper officer by an order made in FORM GST PMT-03.”
4.3.2 Further, vide the same notification, sub-rule (1A) has also been inserted in rule 92 of the
CGST Rules, 2017. The same is reproduced hereunder:
“(1A)Where, upon examination of the application of refund of any amount paid as tax other
than the refund of tax paid on zero-rated supplies or deemed export, the proper officer is
satisfied that a refund under sub-section (5) of section 54 of the Act is due and payable to
the applicant, he shall make an order in FORM RFD-06 sanctioning the amount of refund
to be paid, in cash, proportionate to the amount debited in cash against the total amount
Circular No.135/05/2020 - GST
Page 4 of 6
paid for discharging tax liability for the relevant period, mentioning therein the amount
adjusted against any outstanding demand under the Act or under any existing law and the
balance amount refundable and for the remaining amount which has been debited from the
electronic credit ledger for making payment of such tax, the proper officer shall issue
FORM GST PMT-03 re-crediting the said amount as Input Tax Credit in electronic credit
ledger.”
4.4
The combined effect the abovementioned changes is that any such refund of tax paid on
supplies other than zero rated supplies will now be admissible proportionately in the respective
original mode of payment i.e. in cases of refund, where the tax to be refunded has been paid by
debiting both electronic cash and credit ledgers (other than the refund of tax paid on zero-rated
supplies or deemed export), the refund to be paid in cash and credit shall be calculated in the same
proportion in which the cash and credit ledger has been debited for discharging the total tax liability
for the relevant period for which application for refund has been filed. Such amount, shall be
accordingly paid by issuance of order in FORM GST RFD-06 for amount refundable in cash and
FORM GST PMT-03 to re-credit the amount attributable to credit as ITC in the electronic credit
ledger.
5. Guidelines for refunds of Input Tax Credit under Section 54(3)
5.1
In terms of para 36 of circular No. 125/44/2019-GST dated 18.11.2019, the refund of ITC
availed in respect of invoices not reflected in FORM GSTR-2A was also admissible and copies
of such invoices were required to be uploaded. However, in wake of insertion of sub-rule (4) to
rule 36 of the CGST Rules, 2017 vide notification No. 49/2019-GST dated 09.10.2019, various
references have been received from the field formations regarding admissibility of refund of the
ITC availed on the invoices which are not reflecting in the FORM GSTR-2A of the applicant.
5.2 The matter has been examined and it has been decided that the refund of accumulated ITC
shall be restricted to the ITC as per those invoices, the details of which are uploaded by the supplier
in FORM GSTR-1 and are reflected in the FORM GSTR-2A of the applicant. Accordingly, para
36 of the circular No. 125/44/2019-GST, dated 18.11.2019 stands modified to that extent.
6. New Requirement to mention HSN/SAC in Annexure ‘B’
6.1 References have also been received from the field formations that HSN wise details of goods
and services are not available in FORM GSTR-2A and therefore it becomes very difficult to
distinguish ITC on capital goods and/or input services out of total ITC for a relevant tax period. It
has been recommended that a column relating to HSN/SAC Code should be added in the statement
of invoices relating to inward supply as provided in Annexure–B of the circular No. 125/44/2019-
GST dated 18.11.2019 so as to easily identify between the supplies of goods and services.
6.2
The issue has been examined and considering that such a distinction is important in view
of the provisions relating to refund where refund of credit on Capital goods and/or services is not
permissible in certain cases, it has been decided to amend the said statement. Accordingly,
Annexure-B of the circular No. 125/44/2019-GST, dated 18.11.2019 stands modified to that
extent.
Circular No.135/05/2020 - GST
Page 5 of 6
6.3 A suitably modified statement format is attached for applicants to upload the details of invoices
reflecting in their FORM GSTR-2A. The applicant is, in addition to details already prescribed,
now required to mention HSN/SAC code which is mentioned on the inward invoices. In cases
where supplier is not mandated to mention HSN/SAC code on invoice, the applicant need not
mention HSN/SAC code in respect of such an inward supply.
7.
It is requested that suitable trade notices may be issued to publicize the contents of this
circular.
8.
Difficulty, if any, in implementation of this Circular may please be brought to the notice
of the Board. Hindi version would follow.
(Yogendra Garg)
Principal Commissioner
y.garg@nic.in
Circular No.135/05/2020 - GST
Page 6 of 6
Annexure-B
Statement of invoices to be submitted with application for refund of unutilized ITC
Sr.
No
.
GSTIN
of
the
Supplie
r
Name of
the
Supplier
Invoice Details
Category of input supplies
Centr
al Tax
State
Tax/
Union
Territory
Tax
Integrate
d Tax
Cess
Eligible
for ITC
Amount
of eligible
ITC
Invo
ice
No.
Dat
e
Value Inputs/Input
Services/cap
ital goods
HSN/SAC
Yes/No/Pa
rtially
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
