WHEREAS, the post of Assislant Director (Tech) in pay level-10 was advertised by FSSAI lor lilling up on direct recruitment basis as per the eligibility criteria mentioned in advertisement No. DR-02/2019 dated 26th March, 2019. One of lhe criteria for selection to this post was 'oul of the total experience sought, two…
Official record
Open source pageWHEREAS, the post of Assislant Director (Tech) in pay level-10 was advertised by FSSAI lor lilling up on direct recruitment basis as per the eligibility criteria mentioned in advertisement No. DR-02/2019 dated 26th March, 2019. One of lhe criteria for selection to this post was 'oul of the total experience sought, two years of experience should be in immediate lower pay level in Central Dearness Allowance, or equivalent industrial dearness allowance scale (as applicable) and in case of candidates working in private sector he or she shall be drawing minimum annual cost to company ol Rs 9.7 lakh for last two years.' For this post, the Pay level-7 was considered as immediate lower pay level by FSSAI and accordingly resull was declared on 24.12.2020, offers of appointment were issued, and appointments were made. WHEREAS, a Writ Petition (Civil) No. 13A2021 was filed in the Hon'ble High Court ol Delhi (Learned Single Judge Bench) challenging the selection on the basis of pay level-7. The Hon'ble Court vide judgement dated 4.8.2021 had held thatthe immediate pay level of the aforesaid post is level-g;thatthe selection ol Respondent Nos. 3 to 12 vide result notice daled 24.12.2020 was illegal, and consequently selection and appointment ol respondents Nos.3 to 12 fas detailed below) was set aside: tE-d STFS : estt@fssa i. gov. i n 19th August, 2025 Order resignation lrom the services ol FSSAI) 6. PAYELMAJI 7. SONIKA KUMARI 8. SUKANYA PONDUGALA 9. VINITAVERMA 10. SAKSHEE PIPLIYAL WHEREAS,the above iudgement dated 4.8.2021 was challenged in LPA Nos. 253, 286, 288, 309 of 2021 before the Division Bench of the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi, which were dismissed by the Hon'ble Court vide order 1 l.4.2023. 1 . AMOL RA"JENDRARAO JAGTAP (under suspension w.e.f . 05.05.2024 in the case filed by ACB, CBl, Mumbai) 2. APOORVASRIVASTAV 4. J. JELIN 5. NAVNEET KAUR (already relieved on 02d August 2023 after acceptance ol her 3. BHISLE CHETNA BHARAT WHEREAS, the above judgement dated 11.4.2023 ol the Division Bench of the Hon'ble High Court ol Delhi was challenged in SLP(C) Nos. 8247 & 8264-65 of File no. HR-29/27/2025-HRfSSAI qrrftq srq gvsr sft qrr{ crfufiur Food Satety and Standards Authority of lndia \Fg\ q-fi , o-IcaT ri-s, a-g R-S - 1 1 o oo2 Mr./Ms. 2023 before the Hon'ble Supreme Court of lndia, which were also dismissed vide order dated 31 .7.2025. However, the Hon'ble Supreme Court has clarified that, if the appellants were appointed in the post pursuant to their selection and have continued as such on account ol interim order(s) of the Hioh Court or this court,.emolumenls attached to that post, thua'far releasid in their favour, shall not be recovered lrom them. NqW THEREFORE, in compliance of the ludgement dated 31.7.2025 ol lhe Hon'ble Supreme Court ol lndia and in terms-of londitions laid down in their respective offer of appointment. lhe selection and appointment of abovesaid ten otlicers is declared illegal and consequently their seivices rexcept the service of MS. NAVNEET KAUB who has atread elieved on 02nd August 2023 after y been r SAI) are acceptance of her resignation from FS hereby termrnated wilh effect from 08th August, 2025 (FlN), without any recovery to the emoluments rele in their favour frbm the date oftheir appointment. (G Kamala Va Rao) Chiel Executive Officer, FSSAI To 1. All Oflicials concerned 2. EDs/Advisors, FSSAI HQ. 3. All Divisional Heads of HQ, Directors of Regional Offices and NFLs oFSSAI 4. DDOs ol FSSAI (HQ)/RegionalOtfices/NFLs (lor necessary action) 5. CTO [FSSAI] for uploading on the website of FSSAI and eoffice and other necessary action. 6. Joint Director [Vigilance], FSSAI HQ. Copy to: Sr. PS to Chairperson, FSSAI OSD to CEO, FSSAI. Under Secretary (FR), MoHFW, Nirman Bhawan, NewDelhi Personal Files of the officers concerned. '| 2 3 4
Research the source law
This record is not yet linked to a specific provision. Browse the law library, choose the affected provision and ask against the exact statutory text.
Browse source laws