Request For Proposal: MSME Umbrella Programme 1 | P a g e Micro Small and Medium Enterprise (MSME) Umbrella Programme Component: MSME Support Policies and Programme PN: 09.2459.7-003.00 REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Enabling Effective Implementation of Public Procurement Policy for Micro and Small Enterprises (MSEs) Deutsche Ge…
Official record
Open source pageRequest For Proposal: MSME Umbrella Programme
1 | P a g e
Micro Small and Medium Enterprise (MSME) Umbrella Programme
Component: MSME Support Policies and Programme
PN: 09.2459.7-003.00
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL
Enabling Effective Implementation of Public Procurement Policy for Micro and Small Enterprises (MSEs)
Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH, GIZ Office, B 5/1, First Floor, Safdarjung Enclave New Delhi 110029, India
2 | P a g e
| TITLE OF THE ASSIGNMENT | Enabling Effective Implementation of Public Procurement Policy for MSEs |
|---|---|
| TENDER NUMBER | |
| CONTRACT PERIOD | 9 months |
| DATE OF ISSUE | 11th July 2012 |
| CLOSING DATE | 31st July 2012 |
3 | P a g e
Table of Contents
Section 1: Letter of Invitation ................................................................................................ 4 Section 2: Instructions to Consultants .................................................................................... 5 Address and Formal Requirements............................................................................................. 5 The Technical Proposal................................................................................................................ 6 The Financial Proposal................................................................................................................. 6 Cost of preparing the Bid ............................................................................................................ 6 Material and Equipment ............................................................................................................. 7 Formation of Consortium............................................................................................................ 7 Modification/withdrawal of the bid ........................................................................................... 7 Other Requirements ................................................................................................................... 7 Bid Data Sheet ............................................................................................................................ 8 Section 3: Terms of Reference ............................................................................................. 11 Background................................................................................................................................ 11 Context ...................................................................................................................................... 11 Objective ................................................................................................................................... 13 Scope of Services and Deliverables ............................................................................................ 13 Deliverables and Time Schedule ............................................................................................... 14 Payment Schedule ..................................................................................................................... 15 Eligibility Criteria and Expertise/Skill sets required .................................................................. 15 Other Terms and Conditions ..................................................................................................... 16 Section 4: Technical Proposal: Standard Formats ................................................................. 17 Section 5: Financial Proposal: Standard Formats .................................................................. 21
4 | P a g e
Section 1 — Letter of Invitation
From: Procurement Manager German Development Cooperation Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH, GIZ Office, B 5/1, First Floor, Safdarjung Enclave New Delhi 110029, India
To: All Prospective Bidders
Dear Sir/Madam,
Yours sincerely,
5 | P a g e
Section 2 — Instructions to Consultants
The Consultants are invited to submit a Technical Proposal and a Financial Proposal, as specified in the Data Sheet, for consulting services required for this assignment. The Proposal will be the basis for contract negotiations and ultimately for a signed Contract with the selected Consultant. Consultants are expected to familiarize themselves with conditions and take them into account in preparing their Proposals.
1. Address, and formal requirements Bids are to be sent to- Procurement Manager GIZ Office India B 5/1, First Floor, Safdarjung Enclave, New Delhi 110 029
Deadline for submission of bids: 4:00 pm, 31st July 2012
The bids are to be sent in double envelopes. The inner envelope must be sealed and bear the following inscription:
Envelope 1 Financial Proposal for Consulting Services for “Enabling Effective Implementation of Public Procurement Policy for MSEs”, Office of DC MSME, Ministry of MSME PN: 09.2459.7-003.00
Envelope 2 Technical Proposal for Consulting Services for “Enabling Effective Implementation of Public Procurement Policy for MSEs”, Office of DC MSME, Ministry of MSME PN: 09.2459.7-003.00
The Outer envelope containing these two envelopes should be marked: “Enabling Effective Implementation of Public Procurement Policy for MSEs”, Office of DC MSME, Ministry of MSME PN: 09.2459.7-003.00 Not to be opened before (31st July 2012)
6 | P a g e
All copies of the bid must be submitted by courier/post/hand in letter form. The technical and financial proposal will also be presented in electronic format – on a CD duly labeled as such.
The above formal requirements regarding envelopes and marking also apply to further copies of the bid.
2. The Technical Proposal It should include detailed working concept which allows us to examine the technical aspects in the light of the project objective (only in case, a detailed concept is not already given by GIZ). Also, if applicable, special tasks requested within the scope of the terms of reference (TOR). Technical proposals should be submitted in the following format using standard forms as outlined in Section 4.
There should be no price information anywhere in the technical proposal document. Failure to comply will result in disqualification of the bid.
3. The Financial Proposal Price quotation is to be submitted in a separate envelope together with your technical proposal and should be prepared using the Standard Formats as outlined in Section 5. It shall list all costs associated with the assignment, including (a) remuneration for staff, and (b) reimbursable expenses indicated in the Data Sheet. If appropriate, these costs should be broken down by activity.
4. Cost of preparing the bid No remuneration will be granted for the preparation of the bid and the documents to be attached thereto. The bids, together with the attached documents, shall become the property of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH, without entitlement to remuneration. A request that the first-ranked bidder present candidate staff
7 | P a g e
members previous to the awarding of the contract does not constitute grounds for a claim for reimbursement of related costs from the GIZ.
5. Material and Equipments Details on the materials and equipment needed, generally to be procured by the GIZ; the TORs for planned subcontracts, other measures as well as training planned for partner experts or staffs in the framework of preparation for the assignment are also to be provided, if needed.
6. Formation of consortium Should you form a joint venture group or consortium, the bid must specify the members of this group/consortium and lead pertner. Furthermore, the authorised representatives of the members are to be named. Furthermore, the members must declare that they are jointly and severally liable for the performance of the contract. The formation of joint ventures with a company, also invited by GIZ to submit a bid (in a two stage bid process), requires the prior written consent of GIZ.
7. Modification/withdrawal of the bid Adjustments to or withdrawal of bids are to be communicated in writing by post by the deadline for submission of bids. Subsequent adjustments or modifications to the bid, which can be submitted up to the deadline for submission of bids, shall also be subject to the requirements for sending in the bid. The front of the envelope is to be clearly marked as...
Adjustment to Financial Proposal or Technical Proposal for consulting services for “Enabling Effective Implementation of Public Procurement Policy for MSEs”, Office of DC MSME, Ministry of MSME PN: 09.2459.7-003.00 (as the case maybe)
8. Other requirements Agreements with third parties in restraint of competition, which are to the disadvantage of the GIZ, are not permissible and will lead to the bid not being considered. The documents submitted in response to the request to bid shall be treated confidentially by yourself and may only be made available to third parties in connection with potential
8 | P a g e
subcontractors in relation to your bid. Non-compliance may result in the bid not being considered.
9. Data Sheet
| 1.1 | Name of the Client: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit / German International Cooperation (GIZ) Method of selection: Single stage- two envelop ; Quality-cum-Cost Based Selection Method (QCBS) |
|---|---|
| 1.2 | Financial Proposal to be submitted together with Technical Proposal: Yes Name of the assignment is: “Enabling Effective Implementation of Public Procurement Policy for MSEs”, Office of DC MSME, Ministry of MSME |
| 1.3 | Proposals must remain valid 60 days after the submission date, i.e. until: 29th Sep 2012 |
| 2.1 | All Clarifications required by bidders with reference to this RFP may be sent latest by 18th July 2012 on the email : gtzproc@giz.de . All such queries will be compiled and a consolidated reply will be sent to all the bidders by 24th July 2012 and also put on the website www.tendernews.com |
| 3.1 | Proposals shall be submitted in the following language: English |
9 | P a g e
| appropriate means of transport and the most direct practicable route (3) cost of investigations and surveys in field locations (4)cost of applicable international or local communications such as the use of telephone and facsimile required for the purpose of the Services (5) cost of printing and dispatching of the reports to be produced for the Services | |
|---|---|
| 3.5 | Amounts payable by the Client to the Consultant under the contract to be subject to local taxation: Yes Service tax will be applicable as per prevailing tax law in India. As per Indian Tax Law, tax at source has to be deducted on payments to consultants, if such payments exceed Indian Rupees 30,000 p.a. |
| 4.1 | Consultant must submit the original and 2 copies of the Technical Proposal, and the original of the Financial Proposal Electronic copies of the Technical and Financial Proposal in MS Word must also be submitted on a separate CD along with the hard copy proposals |
| 4.2 | The Proposal submission address is: Procurement Manager, GIZ, B-5/1 (2nd floor), Safdarjung Enclave, New Delhi 110 029 Proposals must be submitted no later than the following date and time: 4:00 pm on 31st July 2012 |
| 5.1 | The number of points to be assigned to each of the staff positions or disciplines shall be determined considering the following sub-criteria and relevant percentage weights: 1) Experience of the company 12% 2) Appropriateness of suggested concept and work plan 25% ( Points on this will be awarded taking into account the technical proposal and technical presentation – which will be required to be made to GIZ project team) 3) Technical backstopping 8% 4) Qualification of local staff 55% Total weight: 100% Please refer annex I for detailed technical assessment grid of the offer |
10 | P a g e
| 5.2 | Financial quotes to be provided in INR |
|---|---|
| 5.3 | The weights given to the Technical and Financial Proposals are: Technical = 0.7 and Financial = 0.3 Total score for technical proposal will be sum of technical proposal and presentation both. |
| 6.1 | Expected date for commencement of consulting services: 16th August 2012 |
11 | P a g e
Section 3: Terms of Reference
1. Background
Office of DC MSME, Ministry of Micro Small and Medium Enterprises, Government Of India - Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH are implementing the “MSME Policies and Programmes” component of the “MSME Umbrella Programme for MSME Promotion”. The project aims at improving the effectiveness and efficiency with which MSME support policies and programmes are implemented, thus promoting increased responsible competitiveness of MSME.
Under this project of “MSME Support Policies and Programmes” , it has been decided by both the implementing partner i.e Office of DC MSME and GIZ to provide support for effective implementation of the Public Procurement Policy for MSEs. A successful roll out of this policy will require an enabling framework at various levels which is aimed to be set-up and strengthened through this project. GIZ is accordingly looking to engage qualified agency to provide required technical support as outlined herein.
2. Context
The Public Procurement Policy was approved by the Cabinet on November 1, 2011 and notified by the Central Government through an order dated March 23, 2012 (under Section 11 of the MSMED Act, 2006). The Policy comes into force with effect from April 1, 2012.
2.1 The salient features of the Public Procurement Policy are as under:
12 | P a g e
An effective implementation of the above would require a significant build-up of knowledge and institutional capacity that must be nurtured over time for meeting the ever growing challenges of public procurement for Micro and Small Enterprises (MSEs), Public Sector Undertakings(PSU) and other stakeholders some of which are as outlined below:
2.2 Key challenges faced by the MSEs:
2.3 Key challenges faced by the PSUs:
Recognising the enormity and complexity of issues, there is a need to work closely with all the relevant stakeholders (MSEs, PSUs, Policy Makers among others) to develop institutional
13 | P a g e
mechanisms necessary for the successful of off take of Public Procurement Policy, which constitutes the prime objective of this project
3. Objective
The broad objective of this consultancy is to assist office of DC MSME in the implementation of “Public Procurement Policy” through provisioning of technical, analytical, facilitation and coordination support. In addition to providing the inputs on different aspects of public procurement current scenario, it will also focus on facilitating the development and strengthening of institutional arrangements and mechanisms necessary for evolving and enforcing the policy and regulatory framework for public procurement. Carrying out consultation process with different stakeholders, development of guidelines, checklists and monitoring framework are other important aspects of this consultancy assignment.
4. Scope of Services
The scope of services and key activities outlined should be delivered in close collaboration with Office of DC MSME and GIZ. Consultants involved in the project would work closely with all the relevant stakeholders e.g. DC MSME and its field institutions, GIZ, MSEs, public sector units, cluster groups, business associations, research and educational institutes among others to achieve the objectives as outlined in Section 3. The scope of services will include but will not be limited to the following key activities:
4.1 Market estimation and Demand Side Profiling
a) Review the current scenario and estimate the overall market potential for MSEs w.r.t. public procurement opportunity through a judicious mix of various cost effective and faster instruments such as expert opinion, stakeholder consultations and secondary research etc. b) Identify and analyse the current procurement norms and mechanisms of 30 PSUs/Central Ministries including the following: i. Indian Railways, BHEL, BEL, NTPC and ONGC ii. Five PSUs each in following five identified sectors i.e. (i) Electronic Services and Design Manufacturing (ii) Mechanical and Mechatronics (iii) Chemical and Pharmaceutical (iv) Defence related to both inland and homeland security and (v) IT and IT enabled units. The selection of PSUs/Central Ministries be such so that the scope and coverage of the analysis and study include all i.e. North, South, West, East (including North-East) regions.
14 | P a g e
The analysis and study of selected PSUs should include but not limited to the following:
c) Identify the challenges faced by the identified PSUs in procurement from MSEs and prepare these as case studies ( challenges and best practices ) wherever possible
4.2 Institutional Support
a) Provide need based ongoing “Technical Support” to the “unit in Office of DC MSME” responsible for implementation of this policy. This would include support to institutional framework such as Review Committee, Grievance Cell – as outlined in public procurement policy by way of development of SOP, creation of stakeholder’s forum etc. b) Identify the institutional arrangements and mechanisms necessary for effective implementation including monitoring of public procurement policy for MSEs, prepare the detailed requirements and an actionable roadmap for the implementation of same. Assistance as required by the Office of DC MSME will also have to be provided by the consultant for setting up of the agreed institutional arrangements. For e.g. i. Currently, one such institutional mechanism being planned is related to hosting and maintaining the supply side MSE data, on existing platforms such as Credit Information Bureau of India Limited (CIBIL), of those MSEs whose capacity grading is conducted by a third party. ii. Another such institutional arrangement being planned is the design of a national web portal (http://www.dcmsme.gov.in/National_Portal.pdf) which shall provide an interactive platform to MSMEs for establishing forward and backward linkages, running of a web based electronic depository inclusive of related fields like capacity credit rating of MSEs etc. and generation of ten digit product-code based information both for PSUs and MSEs
The consultant is required to coordinate and facilitate the consultation process with relevant stakeholders e.g. CIBIL, rating agencies, Office of DC MSME, GIZ, analyse the
15 | P a g e
feasibility, vet the design, identify the key requirements and develop an actionable roadmap for such agreed institutional mechanisms and arrangements to work.
4.3 Information systems
a) Develop the relevant awareness material (flyers / newsletter/ fact sheet), code of best practices/guidelines for PSUs and practical guides (info on forms, process, standards, products and checklists) for MSEs on how they can better tap the market offered by the public procurement market. Also, provide assistance to the office of DC MSME in carrying out consultation process with public institutions, MSEs and other stakeholders to validate and finalise the above codes/guidelines. This is to enable improvement in existing procurement systems for an effective implementation of public procurement policy. b) Design the requisite monitoring framework and associated tools for systematic monitoring of performance achievement of PSUs w.r.t. meeting the planned target of minimum 20% in 3 years.
5. Deliverables
a) Deliverable D1: Within 1 month of start of the assignment the consultant will submit the first 3 months work plan (inception report), and at 3 months thereafter for the remaining of the assignment period, both of which will be discussed and approved by GIZ and DC MSME. b) Deliverable D2: This would comprise a report on “Public Procurement from MSEs – Market potential and Procurement Norms” with specific focus on sections as detailed below (Final report structure to be developed by the consultants in consultation with office of DC MSME): Market assessment including current status and future market potential with detailed insights on product, sectors, buyer categories among others Procurement norms & mechanisms including demand side profiling of 30 PSUs/Central Ministries Challenges and constraints of officers responsible for public procurement in PSUs and other stakeholders The timeframe for this deliverable is 3 months from the start of the assignment. c) Deliverable D3: Analyze, design and put in process the implementation plan for agreed upon institutional mechanisms for effective implementation of the public procurement
16 | P a g e
policy including carrying out the feasibility analysis, developing an actionable roadmap for hosting and maintaining the supply side MSE data, facilitation of stakeholders’ consultation workshop and vetting of design of national portal among others d) Deliverable D4: This would include a) Relevant awareness materials (flyers / newsletter/ fact sheet) targeted at different stakeholders (e.g. PSUs, MSEs , Associations) b) Code of best practices and practical guides for PSUs and MSEs c) Detailed report on monitoring and training requirements e) Deliverable D5: A final report on completion of all the activities with recommendations for the ongoing and future activities towards implementation of public procurement policy
6. Estimated Timeframes
To carry out the above activities and achieve the outlined objectives and deliverables, the consultant is required to deploy a core team comprising 3 members namely a Team Leader, a Senior Resource Person and a Research Fellow/Executive. In addition, the consultant is also required to propose a pool of experts comprising short term “national and or international experts” which can be available on a flexible basis at any time during the contract period, for the work not outlined herein but deemed necessary for implementation of public procurement policy by the Office of DC-MSME. The payment, if any w.r.t. flexible pool of experts would be done on a pro-rata basis based on actual number of man-days involved.
The estimated man days for the core team are as given below:
| Description of expert | Total number of estimated man-days | Estimated Break up of man-days in % |
|---|---|---|
| Home office | ||
| Team Leader | 40 | 30% |
| Senior Resource Person | 90 | 40% |
| Research Fellow/Executive | 80 | 80% |
The maximum number of man-days for experts comprising the flexible pool (as described above) is estimated up to 70 days.
| Description of expert | Total number of estimated man-days* |
|---|---|
| Senior Level Resource Person | 40 |
| Middle Level Resource Person | 30 |
17 | P a g e
The drawing of resources/experts from the flexible pool will be decided by the Office of DC MSME and GIZ for specific need and not by the consultant for the tasks already outlined in this TOR.
7. Eligibility Criteria and Expertise/Skill-sets required
18 | P a g e
8. Duration
Total duration of this will be 9 months from the date of signing of the contract
9. Reporting
During the assignment, consultant will be required to maintain a continuous liaison with Additional Development Commissioner responsible for implementation of “public procurement policy” or his representatives. Reporting will be on monthly basis and should be submitted to both office of DC MSME and GIZ. During the assignment, consultant will adhere to following reporting schedule An Inception Report within 30 days of start of the assignment , setting out the first 3 months work plan Monthly progress report thereof.
10. Payment Schedule
| No | Project Milestone | Payment* | Months |
|---|---|---|---|
| P1 | Contract signing , advance payment | 30% | M1 |
| P2 | Submission and Acceptance of Deliverable D2 | 20% | M4 |
| P3 | Submission and acceptance of all deliverables on completion of assignment | 50% | M9 |
Feedback will be communicated to the consultant continuously at the end of several activities carried during all phases. Where necessary, consultant shall make appropriate changes to improve the deliverables and address this feedback. On the completion of a milestone and it acceptance by the respective division at office of DC-MSME, written confirmation shall be provided to the consultant who will trigger the relevant milestone payment. No payment will be processed without the acceptance of the deliverables. The payment, if any w.r.t. flexible
19 | P a g e
pool of experts would be done on a pro-rata basis based on actual number of man-days involved.
11. Other Terms & Conditions
The end-deliverable and the achievement of final milestone should be approved by the Additional Secretary and Development Commissioner MSME, MoMSME as conditions for release of final payment. All the work/software/reports undertaken/developed/prepared under this assignment are the property of the Ministry of MSME and cannot be used, published, copied or otherwise disseminated without prior written approval.
20 | P a g e
Section 4: Technical Proposal – Standard Formats
With reference to brief guideline provided in section 2 of this RFP, consultants are expected to use the following recommended formats and number of pages for their technical proposals for any of the work packages.
1. Executive Summary : Executive summary should capture important parts of your technical proposal including approach, timeline, milestones and staffing. Executive summary must be confined to maximum 5 pages.
2. Profile 2 page description of background, organisation and competencies of the consulting firms and each associate for this assignment
3. Relevant Experience This section should contain project credentials of the bidder. This section should mention 5 most relevant experiences and must not exceed 10 pages.
FORMAT FOR RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
| Name of Assignment | Client (Including Contact Detail of person in charge) | Start/ End dates | Value (INR/Euro) | Role of the firm/short description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Relevant projects-National | ||||
| Selected Relevant projects-Global |
21 | P a g e
4. Qualification to Terms of reference : This section is intended to record understanding of the assignment and interpretation of the TOR and any observations/suggestions the bidder may have on the terms of reference. Facilities and support required/expected from counterpart should also be mentioned. Maximum number of pages to be used is 3.
5. Technical response : This section should define the approach, methodology, work plan including sub activities and deliverables and how the bidder intends to organise the project team to execute the engagement. Technical response must confine to 30 pages and in following 3 sub sections.
6. Description of the proposed team
FORMAT FOR STAFF (CORE TEAM/FLEXIBLE) TASK ASSIGNMENTS
| Name of Staff | Firm | Area of Expertise | Position Assigned | Task Assigned |
|---|---|---|---|---|
22 | P a g e
FORMAT FOR STAFFING SCHEDULE (Required only for the Core Team)
| No. | Name of Staff | Description | Staff input (In number of Days) | Total Staff input (days) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Month 1 | Month 2 | |||
| Home (days) | ||||
| Field (days) |
Staffing schedule should be specifically broken into Professional staff (International and Indian) and Support Staff.
FORMAT FOR CVs FOR PROPOSED PROFESSIONAL (CORE TEAM/FLEXIBLE) STAFF
| Name: | |
|---|---|
| Nationality: | |
| Designation: | |
| Proposed Position: | |
| Whether Employee of the Firm: | |
| Years with the Firm: | |
| Key Qualifications: | |
| Education: | |
| Recent Relevant Experience: |
23 | P a g e
Record of Employment:
| From | To | Designation & Name of Firm |
|---|---|---|
Languages Known:
| Read | Write | Speak | |
|---|---|---|---|
| S. No. | Work-plan Activities | Team Member | Showing the completion of activities and involvement (maydays) of team member in respective cells | Remarks , If any |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wk 1 | Wk 2 | |||
7. Matters not appropriate in any other section
24 | P a g e
Section 5: Financial Proposal: Standard Formats
Financial Proposal should be submitted with a covering letter clearly mentioning the validity of the quote for minimum 60 days and as per the following format for any of the work packages.
FORM 1: TOTAL COST SUMMARY*
| Description | Cost in INR |
|---|---|
| Professional Fee | |
| Reimbursable Fee | |
| Applicable Tax | |
| Total Cost |
*Including estimates for both Core Team and Flexible Staff. Please refer (Section 3, Sub-section 10) for payment related conditions.
FORM 2: FORMAT FOR STAFF INPUTS AND FEE RATES*
| Name | Description | No. Of Days | Daily Fee Rate in INR | Total Fee (No. Days x Fee) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sub Total | ||||
| Tax |
*Including both Core Team and Flexible Staff
25 | P a g e
FORM 3: FORMAT FOR PROJECTED REIMBURSABLE COST
| Description | Number | Rate | Cost(INR) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vehicle hire | |||
| Airfare | |||
| Accommodation | |||
| Per diem for staff | |||
| Others(please specify) | |||
FORM 4: COST BREAK UP ACCORDING TO THE MAJOR DELIVERABLES (As Outlined in TOR)
| Deliverables (As Outlined In TOR) | Consulting Fee | Reimbursable Fee | Total Amount in INR |
|---|---|---|---|
26 | P a g e
Annex I: Technical Evaluation Grid
Technical Assessment Grid of Offers (AURA)
| Section | MSME Support Policies and Programme | Project Short Title | MSME Umbrella Programme | Date | July 10, 2012 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AV | Manfred Haebig | PN | PN: 09.2459.7-003.0 | ||
| Assessor | Amit Kumar/Neha Nagpal | VN | VN | ||
| Version | Individual assessment/Overall assessment |
| Company 1 | Company 2 | Company 3 | Company 4 | Company 5 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (1) Criteria | (2) Weighting in % | (3) points (max.10) | (4) assessment (2)x(3) | (3) points (max.10) | (4) assessment (2)x(3) | (3) points (max.10) |
| 1. Experience of the Company | ||||||
| 1.1 Technical Experience (state relevant sectors) |
27 | P a g e
| 3. Technical backstopping / Knowledge Management | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.1 Staff and backstopping conception (incl. Capacity Works) | 4 |
28 | P a g e
| - management experience | 2 | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| - ability to work in a team |
29 | P a g e
| 5.4.3 Regional experience / Knowledge of country | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EU, US, India |
Research the source law
This record is not yet linked to a specific provision. Browse the law library, choose the affected provision and ask against the exact statutory text.
Browse source laws| 3.2 | Consultants may associate with other Consultants: Yes |
| 3.2 | The estimated number of calendar-months required is 9 months from the date of contract signing |
| 3.3 | Training is a specific component of this assignment: No |
| 3.4 | Applicable Reimbursable Expenses (1)a per diem allowance in respect of Personnel of the Consultant for every day in which the Personnel shall be absent from the home office for purposes of the Services (2)cost of necessary travel, including transportation of the Personnel by the most |
| Total |
| Total |
| Policy advisory and implementation related experience in Public Procurement for MSEs | 5 |
| Demand-side market potential, existing trends, norms and key challenges w.r.t public procurement | 2 |
| Supply side experience in issues concerning MSEs e.g. market access and procurement related challenges | 2 |
| 1.2 Regional Experience (state country/region) |
| EU, US, India | 3 |
| Total 1 | 12 |
| 2. Appropriateness of suggested concept and work plan |
| 2.1 Interpretation of objectives | 4 |
| 2.2 Strategy (technical concept/alternative concepts) | 7 |
| 2.3 Implementation methods: Management of cooperations, Steering structure, Processes, Learning and Innovation | 8 |
| 2.4 Work schedule and time schedule | 3 |
| 2.5 Monitoring and evaluation concept | 3 |
| Total 2 | 25 |
| 3.2 Knowledge and information management | 4 |
| Total 3 | 8 |
| 4. Consideration of local resources |
| 5. Qualification of proposed staff |
| 5.1 Expert 1: Team Lead |
| 5.1.1 General qualification |
| Edu. qualification/training in areas related to policy design and implementation | 2 |
| Professional experience (min. 10 yrs) in project management, moderating multi-stakeholder consultations involving policymakers | 2 |
| 5.1.2 Specific qualification - special field |
| Advisory and implementation related experience involving multiple stakeholders (PSU, MSEs and Policy Makers) in areas related to public procurement | 6 |
| - management experience | 3 |
| - ability to work in a team |
| 5.1.3 Regional experience / Knowledge of country |
| EU, US, India | 2 |
| 5.1.4 Language skills |
| Subtotal 5.1 | 15 |
| 5.2 Expert 2: Senior Resource Person |
| 5.2.1 General qualification |
| Edu. qualification/training in areas related to policy design and implementation | 2 |
| Professional experience in implementing policy related measures, project execution, moderating multi-stakeholder consultations | 2 |
| 5.2.2 Specific qualification - special field |
| Designing and implementing institutional framework and mechanisms for policy implementation | 6 |
| 5.2.3 Regional experience / Knowledge of country |
| EU, US, India | 2 |
| 5.2.4 Language skills |
| Subtotal 5.2 | 14 |
| 5.3 Expert 3: Research Fellow |
| 5.3.1 General qualification |
| Qualification in areas related to market research, management, economics | 2 |
| Professional experience (min 5 years) in areas related to market research, market assessment & profiling, analytics, report-writing | 2 |
| 5.3.2 Specific qualification - special field |
| Demand and Supply side analysis w.r.t. public procurement | 4 |
| - ability to work in a team |
| 5.3.3 Regional experience / Knowledge of country |
| India | 3 |
| 5.3.4 Language skills |
| Subtotal 5.3 | 11 |
| 5.4 Pool of experts: Senior and Middle Level Resource Person |
| 5.4.1 General qualification |
| Edu. qualification/training in areas related to policy design and implementation | 2 |
| Professional experience in implementing policy related measures, project execution, moderating multi-stakeholder consultations | 2 |
| 5.4.2 Specific qualification - special field |
| Public Procurement Policy Design and Implementation for MSEs | 4 |
| Strong understanding of issues concerning MSEs and PSUs w.r.t. Public Procurement | 2 |
| - ability to work in a team |
| 5.4.4 Language skills |
| Subtotal 5.4 | 10 |
| 5.5 Composition of the team | 5 |
| Total 5. | 55 |
| Grand Total | 100 | 100 |
| Assessment in % |
| place |
| 6. Special advantages / risks (see extra page) |
| place |